| Animal Health : Summary
Summary report of the animal health workshop
One of the most crucial parameters in modern animal husbandry and production is animal health.
Animal welfare, consumer protection and economic success are directly linked to the health
status of farm animals. In addition poor animal health seriously damages the public image
of animal production. Major factors influencing animal health, i.e. housing, breeding and
feeding were subject of other workshops in the series "Sustainable Animal Production". This
workshop dealt with treatment and prophylaxis of health problems of farm animals due to infectious
diseases. For this purpose the field was subdivided in several areas:
Major health problems of farmed animals caused by infectious agents
Emerging and reemerging diseases
List A diseases: Threat and control
Antibiotic resistance
Progress in the diagnosis of infectious diseases
Modern vaccines
New antiinfective drugs
Strategies to avoiding health problems of farmed animals
Major health problems of farmed animals caused by infectious agents
Endemic infectious have a considerable negative impact on the profit of animal production and
there are large variations in animal health status between the different EU member states,
countries, regions and even farms. Factors contributing to this phenomenon are the prevailing
differences in husbandry systems, marked differences in management quality levels, the highly
intensified production, the physiologically marginal potential of food animals to cope with all kind of stresses including infectious agents and the largely monotrait focussed genetic selection programmes. Special attention should be given to food animals affected by metabolic stress. This is a relative problem, largely provoked by one-sided genetic selection on productivity mainly. As a result of this metabolic stress (e.g. after calving or around piglet weaning), endocrinological, neurological and immunological functions are impaired. This may ultimately result in increased disease susceptibility paving the way for a number of facultatively pathogenic micro organisms causing disease. Apart from these multi-factorial infectious diseases several endemic mono-causal infectious agents, e.g. Aujeszky�s disease, influenza, paratuberculosis and IBR/IPV give rise to serious economic losses.
A serious public health issue is the fact that modern livestock production carries implicitly
the risk of presence of carriers of zoonotic agents, e.g. salmonella and Streptococcus suis II,
representing a potential risk for man, sometimes even without causing overt disease in animals.
Emerging and reemerging diseases
Outbreaks of so far unknown diseases, e.g. BSE, paramyxovirus infections
in horses and pigs in Australia, zoonotic H5N1 influenza in Hong Kong and
AIDS in man, have drawn our attention to the subject of emerging diseases.
Today we know that new diseases will strike time and again, and their causative
agents will be identified ever more quickly, either as being well-known agents
that have undergone subtle genetic changes, or as recombinants with other viral
or cellular genes. They may also turn out to be really new, hitherto undiscovered
agents. Every now and then, one of the emerging agents might turn out to be a
'killer' virus wreaking havoc - either to be controlled by veterinary efforts or
peter out in virulence to become a harmless commensal. It is safe to assume that high animal
population densities combined with the close proximity of different animal species could play
a favourable role in the emergence of new diseases. One classical example of a re-emerging
disease is tuberculosis, once thought to be well under control.
List A diseases: Threat and control
List A diseases are defined by the World organisation for animal health
(Office International des Epizooties, OIE, located in Paris) as transmissible diseases which:
have the potential for very serious and rapid spread, irrespective of national borders;
are of serious socio-economic or public health consequence;
are of major importance in the international trade of animals and animal products.
The List A comprises at present (2000) 14 predominantly viral diseases.
The reservoir of List A disease agents in wildlife and in domestic animal populations,
the route and the mode of disease transmission play a major role, when evaluating disease
threat and deciding on control measures to be applied. The threat or risk of a List
A disease entering a susceptible domestic animal population can arise from several
possible sources and it is imperative to assess the risk. Whenever possible this type of
assessment should be based on a quantitative risk-analysis, which gives a transparent,
objective and defensible estimate of the risk posed by a particular action.
A precondition for success in the control of a List A disease outbreak includes
a comprehensive and well-rehearsed contingency plan. The plan must clearly describe:
the legal power held as regards disease notification, stamping-out, payment of compensation,
movement controls, vaccination and use of penalties. Other aspects of the plan refer to the
chain of command; the establishment and operation of disease control centres; the use of
diagnostic laboratories; training of staff and publicity. In the long-term measures of
importance for better disease control include: increased disease surveillance; better
protection measures at farm level and protection measures relating to movement of animals.
Antibiotic resistance
The ability to treat bacterial infections in animals and man with chemotherapeutic
agents represents one of the most important medical achievements of the twentieth
century. However, as a result of the exposure of bacteria to antimicrobial agents,
a large number of genes and mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance has
been developed and the introduction of an antimicrobial agent into clinical use in
both humans and animals has been either accompanied or followed shortly by the
occurrence of resistant bacteria underlining the extraordinary capacity of bacteria
to quickly and efficiently respond to the selective pressure imposed by the use of
antimicrobials. In recent years, bacteria have also shown to be able to develop
resistance to completely synthetic substances and resistance to several antimicrobial
agents as well as against disinfectants, heavy metals or nucleic acid binding substances,
respectively. As a consequence of the widespread use of antimicrobial agents in all fields
of medicine food producing animals as well as pets and humans can act as a reservoir of
resistant bacteria. Of particular interest if not concern is the ability of a few
multiresistant bacteria with pathogenic potential for humans to cross from their
animal hosts to humans via the food chain. Among them subspecies of Salmonella enterica,
Campylobacter spp. as well as Enterococcus spp. are suspected as human pathogens.
However, in the public perception this problem is largely overestimated. Based on
the present evidence, antimicrobial use in animals mainly causes resistance
problems in animals while antimicrobial use in humans mainly accounts for the
resistance problems encountered in human medicine. With the exception of the
afore mentioned resistant zoonotic pathogens, both disciplines are mainly
responsible for their own "home-made" resistance problems. The real problems
of veterinary medicine are the increase in number of resistant bacteria in
animals and the banning of some antiinfective drugs. New antiinfective drugs
are reserved for human medicine only.
Progress in the diagnosis of infectious diseases
A prerequisite for the control of infectious diseases in animals is the availability of
suitable, i.e. reliable, sensitive and inexpensive diagnostic tests. The main reasons
for use of diagnostic tests in farm animals are for individual animal diagnosis, herd
investigations, disease control or disease surveillance. In countries with a highly
developed agriculture the requirement for farm animals is increasingly for large-scale
surveillance programmes. These are usually designed with a mathematical basis to answer
specific epidemiological questions. In several European countries there is currently a
particular emphasis on surveillance of livestock for prevalence of specified food borne
zoonoses such as salmonella, E. coli O157. Large-scale testing requires cheap and robust
tests. The enormous progress in biomedical technology during the last two decades made
the development of novel tests possible, including sensitive genetic analyses for
different purposes, e.g. the selection of sheep resistant to Scrapie or the rapid
identification of dangerous pathogens, respectively. Internal and external quality
assurance of testing is essential and will increasingly be implemented using
independent accreditation, e.g. ISO9000 or ISO 17025.
Modern vaccines
Successful vaccination against infectious diseases has been practiced for over 200 years,
and it is safe to assume that vaccination is the most cost-effective method of
reducing animal suffering and economic losses due to infectious diseases in animals.
However, even with these successes, infectious diseases continue to be of economic
significance to society in reduced productivity and animal death. The advent of genomics,
proteomics, and biotechnology, combined with our understanding of pathogenesis and immune
responses to various pathogens provides us with an unprecedented opportunity to develop safer
and more effective vaccines for many pathogens. In addition to using vaccines to cure infectious
diseases of animals, it is also possible to immunise animals against various hormones and cellular
proteins to improve growth and alter reproductive efficiency. Different types of genetically
engineered vaccines are presently at different stages of development, clinical trials, or
licensing. They include: 1) live vaccines, 2) live chimeric vaccines,
3) live replication-defective vaccines, 4) subunit vaccines, 5) peptide
vaccines in various modifications of monovalent, multivalent, or chimeric
subunit vaccines delivered as individual components or incorporated into
virus-like particles for improved immunogenicity, and 6) polynucleotide vaccines.
However, despite all promising developments the common knowledge that " However
smart we are, microorganisms are smarter than us" might still be true in the future.
New antiinfective drugs
The driving force in the search for new drugs is the human health sector.
We can therefore realistically expect that in the medium term this is where
new antiinfectives for animals will come from. In the medium term, as in the
past, the animal health industry will therefore rely primarily on spin-offs from the human sector.
Four principal drug discovery approaches are employed in the search for new antiinfectives, namely,
the expansion of known drug classes to cover organisms resistant
to earlier members of the class, i.e. the development of new variations of known
antibiotics, e.g., cephalosporins, ß-lactams or macrolides. Apart from some short
term advantages the main disadvantage of this strategy is cross resistance. Thus,
this approach can only be considered at best a temporary solution to the problem of resistance.
the reevaluation of un(der)explored molecules, especially a variety of synthetic
and naturally occurring peptides with antiinfective activity is a promising approach for
a new class of antiinfectious agents
the classical screening of synthetic compounds and natural compounds
isolated from fermentation broths of microorganisms, plants or other organisms
and the identification of novel agents active against previously not-exploited
or even unknown (novel) targets within the pathogen using the tools provided by
genomics, proteomics, bioinformatics and high throughput screening of substances
against known targets.
With prudent use it will be possible to control the spread of the resistance
problem also in the long term. The therapeutic arsenal will grow in the short
and medium term by traditional approaches (i-iii). In the long term, leading edge
biochemical and molecular biological methods together with bioinformatics provide
a good chance of controlling bacterial infections in entirely new ways.
Strategies for avoiding health problems of farmed animals
So far disease risk management is an underestimated instrument in disease combat
programmes while emphasis has been on vaccination and medication. Of course sick
animals should be given the best possible treatment in order to prevent suffering,
death and economic losses. However, in the animal production it is too late to undertake
actions first when clinical signs of disease have developed. Therefore, a health control
scheme should be established that continuously focuses on disease prevention in order to
avoid health problems. Appropriate measures can be summarised as follows:
profound knowledge about and proper diagnosis of infectious diseases
eradication of epizootic diseases, e.g. list A infections
control, reduction or elimination of non-epizootic diseases on all levels of animal
production, e.g., combat sources of infection, decrease of exposure, optimising hygiene,
prudent use of antimicrobial treatment
improve host resistance by e.g., breeding, optimal nutrition, optimal
housing and ventilation, good management (e.g., all in all out), reduction of stress
boost Immunity by e.g., vaccination, good maternal immunity, control of
immunosuppressive diseases
The significance of the measures exemplified above can be better understood
when considering that most infectious diseases caused by one specific microbe
usually primarily have a multifactorial course. All factors thus decreasing the
risk of an infection becoming established will contribute to an improved health
situation in individual animal and on a herd basis.
Conclusion:
The intelligent use of the wide panorama of available disease preventive measures, as
exemplified above, easily contributes to a good health situation and improved economy
of animal production. The implementation on both herd and national level needs close
co-operation between producer, stakeholders, vets and responsible authorities and
sometimes also consumers. Economic incitements are usually a driving force and ideally a
disease preventing health control should be driven from the producer. At herd level basic
hygienic routines should first be implemented. Disease preventing health controls is a
continuously ongoing process with the object to maintain and improve animal health.
|